"The one who is always trying to discover the unknown,
Could not discover himself.
The one who captured the rays of the sun,
Could not fill the void of his own life.
The one who illuminated the world with lanterns,
Failed to realize the darkness of his own heart.
If there is darkness in one's own heart, what is the use of light on the outside?"
- Allama Iqbal, "Filling Our Void"
There is always the question of whether you can
separate an artist from his/her work. Or a great leader from his/her confused or
sordid persona life. In the past, this separation was possible. In some respects,
it still is. But we are swiftly moving into an era when the divorce between Work
and Source will not be acceptable or even desirable. Non-integration is no
longer an option.
I believe this is true for several reasons. First, there
is the revolution in the means and speed of communication. In the past, information
was very limited. We knew about people through word of mouth, through their own
personal correspondence or memoirs, through other people's recollections.
Today, technology has so blurred the line between
personal and public that many artists and leaders are confronted with the
details of their "private" lives - whether true or fabricated - in
almost real time, and before a global audience. It is becoming increasingly
difficult to watch a film or policy debate without making even subtle character
judgments: "Oh, he's the one who had an affair with..." "She was
involved in that hit-and-run..." Even if the information is false, life in
the public eye requires much greater vigilance to preserve one's reputation.
Second, and beyond self-preservation, there is a
deepening thirst for honesty, sincerity, and heartfulness in art and leadership. In the past, people were
content with making a living, or if they were hungrier, with the search for
"meaning." Now, even meaning is inadequate. People are looking for
meaning that is meaningful - which is not a truism. Many works of art have a
kind of meaning - they can be conceptual, existential, or beautiful. Even
ugliness and brutality, as witnessed in both politics and many commercial films, has a kind of
meaning.
But this is not what people are seeking. In art and
leadership, connection is everything. And connection cannot be faked. Without the
integration of ethical living and creativity, connection is impossible. Why?
Because connection rests, first, on contact with one's soul. And this bond is broken if a person is destructive of human relationships.
In politics, leadership without integrity is leading
us farther away from our station as beings with a conscience and nobility.
In education, social services, and international
development, ticking boxes and writing reports is no longer satisfactory. In
fact, it is harming everyone from office workers to aid beneficiaries by
talking about everything from "empowerment" to
"sustainability" without one essential word...love.
In the arts, intellect and creativity divorced from
humanity is producing much that is half-living, and much that is dead.
In religion, morality without relevance or role
models is proving an empty ethics.
In science and academia, the highest aim has become
to pick holes in each other's arguments. Personality politics is the name of
the game, not collaboration, dialogue, or mentorship.
In industry and economics, the quest for utility and profitability
leads to unceasing cycles of boom and bust because concepts like detachment,
sacrifice, and service are not included in our models.
This is why I believe the era of non-integration
must end. Because is becoming too painful to look at ourselves in the mirror without seeing, at the same time, the world we have created.